Chapter 09 of 12 in The FracHaus Guide to Property Development

The hard truths

Why most people never develop, and the mistakes that catch first-timers.

Now for the chapter most guides leave out, because it is bad for conversion rates. We are including it because it is the entire reason this guide exists: we want you to see development clearly before you go anywhere near it, with us or anyone else.

Chapter 9 of the FracHaus property development guide, the hard truths, shown as a page beside its illustration

The three-way squeeze

Doing your own development demands three things at once.

Time. Not huge hours, as chapter 3 showed, but the right hours at unpredictable moments, for two years, while your job and family carry on.

Money. The equity gate from chapter 6, typically six figures of cash or equity before a bank will engage, plus a buffer you hope never to use.

Experience. The unknown unknowns. First-timers do not fail because they are careless. They fail because nobody told them which questions existed.

Most people can summon two of the three. It is the third that gets them.

The classic first-timer mistakes

Ask anyone who has spent decades in this industry and the same failure patterns come up every time: buying a site before deciding the strategy, paying the vendor’s price instead of the residual, feasibilities missing whole cost categories, no contingency and borrowing to the absolute limit, the wrong ownership structure discovered at tax time, finance assumed rather than confirmed, and going it entirely alone to save on advice. Every one of these is survivable on paper and expensive in person.

The risks, named honestly

RiskWhat it looks likeHow professionals manage it
MarketEnd values fall during the projectBuy at residual, keep the full margin as buffer, presales lock prices early
ApprovalCouncil delays, conditions or refusalSubject-to-DA contracts, approved sites, quality lodgement
ConstructionBuilder failure, variations, latent conditionsBuilder due diligence, fixed-price contracts, contingency, QS-certified claims
Finance and ratesCosts of money rise, terms tightenConservative gearing, buffers, terms locked early
InexperienceUnknown unknowns, in every category at onceExperienced teams, mentors, and honestly, scars

Keeping an eye on the wider market helps with the first and fourth of those, which is what our property market news and commentary is for.

One of the investors in our Sapphire Place project at Palm Beach invested time in a professional development course before ever committing money. Her conclusion is the most useful sentence in this guide:

“I have a sound understanding of the figures a development can and should achieve, and I know most first-time developers do not maximise their returns. I am also time poor. This is a strategy I could not pull off on my own right now.”An investor in our Sapphire Place project at Palm Beach, five townhouses. She chose co-development instead, and chapter 10 shows how that ended.

That is not defeat. That is an investor who understands the game well enough to choose her position on the field. Which brings us, at last, to the position we built.

Questions people ask about this

What are the main risks of property development?

Five. Market risk, where end values fall during the project. Approval risk, where council delays, conditions or refuses. Construction risk, covering builder failure, variations and latent conditions. Finance and rate risk, where the cost of money rises or terms tighten. And inexperience, which quietly multiplies all four.

Why do most people never develop property?

Because solo development demands time, money and experience at the same time. The time is not huge in total hours but it lands at unpredictable moments across two years. The money is six figures of cash or equity before a bank will engage. The experience is the unknown unknowns. Most people can summon two of the three, and it is the third that stops them.

What mistakes do first-time developers make?

The same ones, repeatedly. Buying a site before deciding the strategy. Paying the vendor's asking price instead of the residual land value. Feasibilities that miss whole cost categories. No contingency and borrowing to the absolute limit. Discovering the wrong ownership structure at tax time. Assuming finance rather than confirming it. And going it entirely alone to save on advice.

Your next step

Eyes open now?

That was the point. If you are still curious, the next chapter is the one you have been reading towards.

Join the community