After the May 2026 budget

The market decides your rent and capital growth. Informed investors manufacture theirs.

For most investors the plan was simple: buy an established home, gear the loss against your salary, and wait for the cycle to hand you the next deposit. From July 2027 that deduction goes, and so does the 50% capital gains discount. Brand new homes are the exception on both counts. Co-develop one for a cash return, or keep it at the developer's cost price with the equity already in it.

The dual lens method for property investing: a price lens showing a cost tag with the retail tag struck out, and a growth lens showing a suburb map and a rising chart, both focused on a brand new Australian townhouse pair
Why this exists

Ordinary property investing asks you to wait and hope.

You buy at retail

You pay the full market price, then need the market to rise before you are ahead. The developer's margin went to someone else.

You wait on the cycle

Capital growth depends on forces you don't control: rates, sentiment, supply. It can take years, or go sideways.

You carry it alone

A seven-figure mortgage, all the risk on one asset, and holding costs eating the yield while you wait.

Before you read another word

Is property really finished? Test your instincts.

Seven quick steps. Make a guess at each one, and we'll show you the real number.

the dual lens method Step 1 of 7

Everyone agrees on one thing

“The May budget killed property investing.”

One question before you believe them.

Which home did that budget just make more attractive to an investor?

What changed in May

Brand new is now the only home you can negatively gear. That isn't the trap it sounds like.

From 1 July 2027, negative gearing on established homes is wound back and the 50% capital gains discount is replaced with an indexed cost base. Negative gearing has not been abolished. It has been narrowed to brand new homes, the ones that add to supply.

So the tax system is pointing investors at new builds, and most people's first reaction to that is a fair one.

You pay top dollar off the plan, and then you wait years for the value to catch up.
The objection we hear most

At retail, often true. A retail price carries the developer's margin, the marketing, the display suite, the sales commissions, and a little optimism about what the place will be worth once it's finished. None of that is bricks.

New builds are not overpriced. Retail is.

Take that out at the source and the same house is a different investment. That's the first of the two lenses we look through before a project goes ahead.

  • ~5%Selling costs: agents, commissions, the glossy brochures
  • ~15%The developer's margin, and the optimism about what it'll be worth
  • ~80%The cost to actually create the home: land, approvals, build, delivery
Where a retail price goes. The top fifth never touches the house. Illustrative and general to the market, and the dollar version is in chapter one of the guide.
The dual lens method

Two lenses. One decides what you pay. One decides what happens after.

Every property decision comes down to two questions. We look through both before we commit a dollar.

A new home carrying two price tags, the retail one crossed out and the cost one kept

The price lens

What you pay

Every brand new home has two prices. Come in on the development side and the margin, usually around 20 per cent, comes off before retail exists: equity the day you get the keys, and a better yield for as long as you own it.

How the cost price works →
A location pin on a suburb map, leading to a rising growth chart

The growth lens

What happens after

A national headline averages about 15,000 suburbs, so it describes almost nowhere. Boomscore, our sister research platform, reads supply and demand suburb by suburb, and the trend in each. If the data doesn't back a location, we don't build there.

How we read a location →

The two work on you independently.

A tight location lifts rents and values whatever you paid. A cost price protects you wherever you bought. The price lens gives you the head start. The growth lens is what compounds it.

The four outcomes of price and location combined
A pocket the data supports An average suburb
Developer's cost price Cost price, good pocketBoth lensesEquity on the day you settle, and organic capital growth on top of it. Cost price, average suburbA risky oneYou start in front, and then not a lot happens.
Retail price Retail price, good pocketA slow resultThe growth turns up, but you paid the margin to get there. Retail price, average suburbWait and hopeThe usual outcome, and the reason most portfolios stop at one.

The right suburb at the wrong price is a slow result. The right price in the wrong suburb is a risky one. You want both.

It has happened, with the numbers left in

A finished home that settled 21.7% under valuation.

Sapphire Place at Palm Beach on the Gold Coast: five completed townhouses. One investor kept a home at developer cost price instead of selling for cash. We publish the 2015 projection beside the 2016 settlement, because a number you can check is worth more than one you cannot.

  • 21.7%Manufactured equity, beating the 20% benchmark
  • 57%Cash-on-cash return on capital
  • 6.63%Gross yield on cost, against 5.36% at retail
The completed Sapphire Place townhouse at Elanora, on the Gold Coast

I have a sound understanding of the figures a development can and should achieve, and I know most first-time developers do not maximise their returns. I am also time poor. This is a strategy I could not pull off on my own right now.

Tracy Smith, FracHaus investor Tracy Smith SMSF investor, banker Read her full review
Your next step

Not ready to talk? Join the community anyway.

Tell us which path fits and we'll share the next step when the timing is right for you. We never make an offer until we've spoken personally.

Join the community